Blog

The Method That Captures 4-7x More ROI

Your training programme just ended. Participants rated it 4.8 out of 5. The feedback forms are glowing. Leadership is delighted.

Three months later, nothing has changed.

Welcome to the satisfaction trap - where high ratings mask low transfer, and low transfer kills R.O.I.

If you’re serious about capturing the 353% ROI that research proves training can deliver, it’s time to talk about delivery method. Because the gap between 10% transfer (lectures) and 70% transfer (simulations) is the difference between wasted budget and transformational impact.

The Transfer Rate Hierarchy: What the Research Actually Shows

Carter and Parker’s research, building on decades of training effectiveness studies, reveals a clear hierarchy of methods ranked by their ability to drive workplace behaviour change:

Low Transfer Methods (10-15%):

• Lectures and presentations
• Videos and webinars
• Reading assignments
• Passive observation

Moderate Transfer Methods (20-30%):

• Case study discussions
• Group exercises
• Facilitated workshops
• Structured Q&A sessions

High Transfer Methods (40-70%):

• Business simulations and games
• Role-play with feedback
• On-the-job coaching
• Assessment-driven development
• Action learning projects

The difference isn’t marginal. It’s exponential - and it directly determines how much of the available ROI you capture.

 

Why Simulations Win: The Neuroscience of Learning

Research from cognitive psychology and neuroscience explains why experiential methods deliver superior transfer:

1. Active Engagement vs. Passive Reception

Lectures activate only the auditory processing centres of the brain. Simulations engage multiple systems: problem-solving, decision-making, emotional regulation, motor planning, and social cognition.

The more neural pathways involved in learning, the stronger the memory encoding - and the higher the transfer rate.

2. Contextual Learning

The brain learns best when new information is embedded in realistic contexts. Simulations recreate the complexity, ambiguity, and pressure of real workplace scenarios.

When participants later encounter similar situations at work, their brains recognise the pattern and retrieve the learned behaviour automatically. This is transfer.

3. Emotional Anchoring

Simulations generate genuine emotional responses: frustration when processes fail, satisfaction when teams collaborate effectively, urgency when deadlines loom.

Research shows that emotionally charged experiences create stronger memories and higher transfer rates than neutral, lecture-based content.

4. Immediate Feedback Loops

In lectures, feedback (if it exists) comes days or weeks later via assessments. In simulations, feedback is immediate and consequence-based: you see the results of your decisions in real time.

This accelerates learning and embeds new behaviours more effectively than delayed, abstract feedback.

 

The Slingshot Simulation: Transfer in Action

At MLR, the Slingshot! business simulation and the Hat Factory demonstrate these principles in practice.

With Slingshot! participants take on roles in a model dragster manufacturing process. Over three production runs, they experience:

• Unclear goals and communication breakdowns (just like real organisations)
• Customer demands and quality pressures (just like real markets)
• Process inefficiencies and cross-functional friction (just like real teams)

After each run, structured debriefs drive reflection and redesign. Participants don’t just learn about process improvement - they experience the consequences of poor processes and the impact of effective redesign.

The result? Paul Taylor at DHL reported an 8% productivity improvement immediately and £450k cost reduction over nine months following Slingshot-based training. And the Christmas that came at the end of those nine months, one of their busiest ever, they nearly doubled their output. That’s not satisfaction. That’s transfer. That’s ROI.

 

Assessment Tools: The Transfer Multiplier

Research by Tracey, Noe, and others emphasises that training effectiveness improves when methods are matched to objectives. But there’s another variable that amplifies transfer: self-awareness.

This is where assessment tools become critical.

When participants complete tools like Personal Style Inventory, What's My Communication Style?, or Birkman, they gain insight into their natural patterns of behaviour, motivation, and perception.

Why this matters for transfer:

• Personalisation: Generic training advice often fails because it doesn’t account for individual differences. Assessment-driven training tailors recommendations to each participant’s style, increasing relevance and application.
• Self-Monitoring: Awareness of your default behaviours enables you to catch yourself in the moment and choose alternative responses. This is the essence of transfer.
• Team Dynamics: Understanding colleagues’ styles reduces friction, improves communication, and accelerates collaborative problem-solving - all of which drive business outcomes.

Gallup’s research on CliftonStrengths demonstrates this effect: employees who receive strengths-based development (assessment + coaching) are 6x more likely to be engaged and show measurably higher performance than those receiving generic training.

 

The ROI Calculation: Transfer Rates in Pounds

Let’s make this concrete with a £100,000 training investment:

Scenario A: Lecture-Based Training (10% Transfer)

• Potential business value: £353,000 (353% ROI)
• Captured value at 10% transfer: £35,300
• Net return: -£64,700 (loss)

Scenario B: Simulation + Assessment-Based Training (50% Transfer)

• Potential business value: £353,000 (353% ROI)
• Captured value at 50% transfer: £176,500
• Net return: +£76,500 (77% ROI)

Scenario C: Integrated Experiential Programme (70% Transfer)

• Potential business value: £353,000 (353% ROI)
• Captured value at 70% transfer: £247,100
• Net return: +£147,100 (147% ROI)

The method you choose doesn’t just influence learning. It determines whether your training investment generates profit or loss.

 

What High-Transfer Training Looks Like

Based on research and 25 years of consulting experience, here’s the blueprint:

Before Training:

• Assessment tools to establish baseline and personalise content
• Clear individual participant behavioural objectives (not just knowledge objectives)
• Manager briefings to prepare for post-training support and to declare the business improvement objectives

During Training:

• Experiential simulations that mirror real workplace challenges
• Structured reflection and debrief after each activity
• Role-play with video feedback and peer coaching
• Action planning with specific, measurable commitments

After Training:

• Manager check-ins at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
• Peer learning groups to share application successes and challenges
• Refresher sessions to reinforce and extend learning
• Measurement of behavioural change and business impact

This isn’t more expensive. It’s more effective - and when you calculate R.O.I. properly, it’s dramatically more profitable.

 

Your Next Step

If you’re tired of training programmes that generate satisfaction but not results, let’s design something different.

Something built on evidence. Something designed for transfer. Something that captures the ROI research proves is possible.

 

Let’s talk about what high-transfer training looks like in your organisation.

Contact Bob Hayward at MLR / Be More Effective:📧 MLR@bemoreeffective.com📞 +44 (0)1793 686512 (option 3)

Explore our evidence-based tools and simulations:🎯 Slingshot!📊 Personal Style Inventory💬 What's my Communication Style?